Naming the shorter side of the Edgbaston limit 'unusual' and 'insane', India commander Virat Kohli on Sunday proceeded to point fingers at the components of the ground, which he accepted helped the England openers more toward the beginning of the match. Kohli did not legitimately allude the short 59-meter limit on one side as one reason behind India's 31-run annihilation to England, however the Indian commander tried no endeavors to conceal his disappointment about the equivalent. 

Britain openers, Jonny Bairstow specifically exploited the short 59-meter Edgbaston limit to handle the Indian wrist spinners Yuzvendra Chahal and Kuldeep Yadav. Bairstow, who hit his first World Cup hundred crushed five - four of those off Chahal - of his six sixes towards that shorter limit. Bairstow (111) put a rankling 160-run opening stand with Jason Roy(66), which constantly kept England on top of things. 

"It's an occurrence that it (the short limit) just falls under the confinements of the briefest limit you can have in the competition," Kohli told the host telecaster in the post-coordinate introduction. "So very peculiar on a level pitch, it's the first occasion when we've encountered that so it's insane that things fall set up like that arbitrarily." 

Also Read:- India vs England: Ravindra Jadeja’s stunning diving catch ends Jason Roy’s stay

Both Kuldeep and Chahal had inconveniences managing unnatural shorter side of the limit. Chahal proceeded to yield 88 keeps running in his 10 overs - the most by any Indian spinner in an ODI ever. Kuldeep too went for bounty in his initial 5 overs before making a decent rebound towards the conclusion to complete with figures of 1 for 72 in his 10 overs. 

Kohli yielded that Kuldeep and Chahal could have been more intelligent with their lines however accepted the short limit made their activity way more intense than it ought to have been. 

"In the event that batsmen can turn around range you for a six on a 59-meter limit at that point there isn't much you can do as a spinner. There is no kind of space to think whether you will get out or not and one side was around 82 (meters) or something to that effect. Better believe it, look, they must be savvy with the with lines they bowled, however with one short limit it was hard to contain runs." 

Curiously, India had communicated their hesitations about the shorter side of the limit toward the beginning of the game. India's instructing staff and Virat Kohli were seen having a word with the head groundsman of Edgbaston in regards to the elements of the ground before hurl on Sunday. 

The size of the limit, be that as it may, was not chosen by the England and Wales Cricket Board. Since World Cup is an ICC competition, the playing conditions goes under ICC locale and they are the ones who decide the limit estimate as well. 

The Indian chief additionally conceded that his side was not clinical with the bat while pursuing 338 for triumph. 

"...we weren't clinical with the bat I assume, in light of the fact that the wicket was level. We ought to have quickened and drawn nearer, however they (England) bowled magnificently," Kohli said. 

"In the event that we were clinical with the bat, if the expulsions didn't occur around then, the outcome could have been unique. We had a better than average shot, when they (Pant and Pandya) were in there to strike a couple and draw nearer to the objective and trigger frenzy in their (England) changing area. We continued losing wickets and that doesn't help in a major pursue," he included.

Also Read:- ICC World Cup 2019: I’m hungrier than ever before, says Hashim Amla